Tweet Tweet Tweet

SydWalker 577323167980498944

imp?s=124191&sz=1x1&li=7&m=39d88c3031d85ed538924a9295b5f453&p=a2136b2ffb6b4089b119f61ae48ef00c16ce0cdd imp?s=124192&sz=1x1&li=7&m=39d88c3031d85ed538924a9295b5f453&p=a2136b2ffb6b4089b119f61ae48ef00c16ce0cdd
imp?s=124193&sz=116x15&li=7&m=39d88c3031d85ed538924a9295b5f453&p=a2136b2ffb6b4089b119f61ae48ef00c16ce0cdd imp?s=124194&sz=69x15&li=7&m=39d88c3031d85ed538924a9295b5f453&p=a2136b2ffb6b4089b119f61ae48ef00c16ce0cdd
SydWalker Mar 16th 2015, 04:29
@abc730 @TheAusInstitute I’d like to know how much of this unfairness was inherent in Keating’s original design (v due to Howard’s tweaking)





SydWalker 577323167980498944


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s